Rocky Lemus, Forage Extension Specialist, Mississippi State University, Box 9555, Starkville, MS 39762, Lawrence C. Garcia, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 4905 Anetta Dr., Midland, TX 79703, and David Colbert, Agricultural Sciences, Texas A&M University - Commerce.
Increased
consumption of oil in the U.S.,
coupled with unstable world markets, justifies research and development of sustainable
and economical fuel alternatives. Global
increases in the concentration of atmospheric CO2 have lead to
strong interest in assessing effects of land use and management practices on
soil organic carbon (SOC) pools and flux. Bioenergy crops have potential as a
sustainable fuel alternative to fossil fuels and offer the potential to
mitigate green house emissions. Special
interest has been given to herbaceous and woody species as energy crops and a source
of biofuel feedstock. The U.S. Department of Energy has interest in switchgrass
(Panicum virgatum L.) as an energy
crop due to its high biomass production, extensive root system, and the fact
that it grows well in a variety of soils. Land management plays a direct role
in the productivity and effectiveness of land used to produce biofuel. The
principal objective of this field study was to assess these land management
effects on SOC and N concentrations and pools under long-term studies of
bioenergy crops on four northeast Texas
soils in adjacent counties. Soil
analyses under switchgrass management were compared to soils under crop,
pasture or forestland use on the same soil series. Soil cores were collected across four soil
series to 10-cm depth and were evaluated to determine bulk density, volumetric
water content, and SOC and N pools. Results showed that carbon sequestration
rates were higher for switchgrass when compared to other cropping systems
within each soil type. Significant differences in bulk density, water content,
C and N pools among soils and cropping systems (P<0.05) were also shown. There
was a strong linear relationship between C and N pools for each soil type and
land use. Such empirical relationships,
however, were soil and land use specific.