Jose Pantoja1, Leonel Espinoza, and David M. Miller2. (1) Crop, Soil, & Environment Sciences, University of Arkansas, 115 Plant Science Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701, (2) Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 115 Plant Science, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Potassium (K) is used in large quantities by nearly all agronomic crops. Although total soil K generally exceeds crop uptake, in most soils only a small fraction of the total K exists in plant available forms. Potassium is found in four phases: solution, exchangeable, non-exchangeable and mineral. It is known that the ability of a soil to supply K for plant uptake depends not only on the concentration of K in the available phases (Intensity) but also on the amount of K in the non-exchangeable phase (Quantity) which can become available during the growing season. The objectives of this study were: i) to characterize the Quantity/Intensity (Q/I) relationships (buffer power) of Arkansas soils, and ii) to understand the ability of such soils to release or fix K. A total of six soils collected in the Mississippi delta region of Arkansas were used in this study. Nutrients extractions were conducted by using Mehlich-3, Ammonium Acetate (NH4OAC) and Water. Non-exchangeable K was also determined by using the method proposed by Cox et. al. (1999) and Quantity / Intensity relations were determined by using the procedure of Wang et. al. (2004). The levels of plant available K (Mehlich-3 extractable) were in the “very low” to “low” range for the silt loam soils and from “medium” to “above optimum” for the clay soils, according to University of Arkansas’ guidelines. Mehlich-3 and NH4OAC extracted similar amounts of K, while water extracted the least and NaBPh4 extracted the most. The NaBPh4 extraction represents plant available and some non-exchangeable K. For this comparison, the NaBPh4 fraction was obtained after incubating the soils for 10 minutes so it could be comparable to the Mehlich-3 extraction. When the incubation time was extended higher amounts of K were extracted for all the soils. The Q/I relationships showed clear differences among silt loam soils and clay soils, with DK ranging from -0.13 to 0.36 cmol kg-1 for silt loam soils and from -0.64 to 2.17 cmol kg-1 for clay soils. These results confirm that the clay soils have a greater capacity to fix K than the silt loam soils. The potential buffering capacity (PBC) of the soils ranged from 9.4 to 10.9 cmol kg-1/(cmol L-1)1/2 for the silt loam soils and from 53.9 to 127.9 cmol kg-1/(cmol L-1)1/2 for clay soils, which is an indication of the greater ability of clay soils to provide plant available K. The quantity of DK due to non-exchangeable phase was less than that due to exchangeable phase as the CR was increased for all soils. Results showed that non-exchangeable K contributed between 25 to 40% of the K buffering capacity in the silt loam soils, and from 15 to 19% for clay soils. The relation between DNEK and the Ô was linear, and soil ability for K release and fixation (β) varied from 0.02 to 0.03 for silt-loam soils and from 0.03 to 0.09 for finer-textured soils. This indicates that from 2% to 3% of added K is converted to the non-exchangeable form (fixation) in silt loam soils and from 3% to 9% in clay soils. Results indicate that the clay soils are much more highly buffered than the silt loam soils. Clay soils can sustain K supply for longer periods than silt loam soils because of their higher buffering capacity. The majority of this buffering was attributable to the exchangeable K phase. When K is added, clay soils also have higher potential to convert K to the non-exchangeable form. This information reinforces the idea that soil buffering capacity should be considered when formulating K fertilizer recommendations.