Wednesday, November 15, 2006
293-16

Implications of a Conservation Practices Inventory for Water Quality in an Iowa Watershed.

Mark D. Tomer1, Gregg Hadish2, David E. James3, and Kevin J. Cole3. (1) Nat'l Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011, (2) USDA-NRCS, 210 Walnut St, Rm 693 Federal Building, Des Moines, IA 50309, (3) USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Dr, Ames, IA 50011

The Iowa River’s South Fork drains 78,000 ha of glacial terrain. Subsurface drainage is extensive and corn and soybean rotations occupy 85% of the watershed. There are about 100 confined livestock operations in the watershed, most producing swine. Given prevailing practices, we estimate manure from these operations is annually applied to 27% of the watershed, at 200 kg N ha-1 yr-1 preceding corn, a rate that may lead to soil P accumulations. An inventory of conservation practices and residue cover was conducted during May 2005. A sequence of USDA-NASS annual crop cover data was used to identify and map crop rotations. We found that 87% of the area in corn in 2004 had adequate (>30%) residue cover at the next planting, whereas, only 47% of the 2004 soybean acreage had >30% residue. This raises concerns for the common practice of fall-applying manure into soybean residue. Decreases in residue and increases in soil P are likely consequences, which can interact to magnify runoff P losses. Stream discharge and nutrient concentrations are being monitored at stream and tile gauges in the watershed. Concentrations of NO3-N and total P exceed ecological thresholds most of the time (>70%). But the economic value of NO3-N losses, in terms of fertilizer costs, are about 20 times that of P. Producers therefore have economic incentive to decrease N leaching, but economic incentives to reduce P losses are comparably small. Management alternatives and conservation systems that can reduce losses of both nutrients are needed.


Handout (.pdf format, 1065.0 kb)