Wednesday, November 7, 2007 - 10:35 AM
243-5

In-Situ Treatment of Non-Point Source Pollution Part 2: Field Results from Two Different Treatment Structures.

Karen Grubb1, Joshua McGrath1, Chad Penn2, Ray Bryant3, Peter J. A. Kleinman4, and Arthur Allen5. (1) 0214 H.J. Patterson Hall, Bldg. 073, University of Maryland, University of Maryland, Dept. of Environmental Science & Technology, College Park, MD 20742-5825, (2) Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma State University/USDA-ARS, 367 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, (3) USDA-ARS, Pasture Research Lab, Builiding 3702 Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802-3702, (4) USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Curtin Road, Building 3702, University Park, PA 16802, (5) University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Univ. of Maryland E. Shore, 30921 Martin Court/crop & Aquaculture, Princess Anne, MD 21853

Agricultural drainage ditches are commonplace on Maryland's eastern shore and represent a major transport pathway for nutrients and sediments to surface-water bodies. They also represent a possible intervention point for removal of non-point pollution. Two filtration systems were installed on Maryland's eastern shore. The first was a P removal structure filled with an aluminum oxide, iron oxide and a calcium sulfate/carbonate rich residual derived from the treatment of acid mine drainage, installed in August 2006 on a small ditch draining 2.5 ha. The second was a gypsum bed filtration system, installed on a larger, Public Drainage Association ditch draining 18 ha in April 2007. We will report on the performance of these ditch filtration systems in terms of cost of filtration system construction and maintenance, availability and environmental safety of the PSMs, P-sorption efficiency, and cost of disposing of P-saturated PSMs, all of which are determining factors for the feasibility of wide-spread adoption of these practices.