Saturday, 15 July 2006
152-9

Effect of Tillage, N Fertilizer and Crop Residue on Yield, Nutrient Uptake, Soil Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Sukhdev.S. Malhi1, Reynald Lemke1, Z. H. Wang2, and Baldev S. Chhabra3. (1) Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Hwy.6 South, Melfort, SK Canada S0E 1A0, Saskatchewan, SK 1240, Canada, (2) Northwest Agriculture and Forestry Univ, Yangling, China, (3) Univ of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada

Management practices that simultaneously improve soil properties and yield are crucial to sustain high crop production and minimize detrimental impact on the environment. A 4-yr (1998 to 2001) field experiment was conducted to determine the influence of tillage and crop residue management on crop yield, N uptake and C removal in crop, soil organic C and N, inorganic N and aggregation, and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions on a Gray Luvisol (Boralf) soil near Star City, Saskatchewan, Canada. with two tillage systems: no tillage (NT), and conventional tillage (CT); two levels of straw: straw retained (S), and straw removed (NS); and four rates of fertilizer N: 0, 40, 80, and 120 kg N ha-1, except no N to pea phase of the rotation. The plots were seeded to barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in 1998, pea (Pisum sativum L.) in 1999, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in 2000 and canola (Brassica napus L.) in 2001. Tillage and straw treatments generally had no effect on crop yield during the first three years. But in 2001, NT produced 55, 32, and 20% greater canola seed, straw and chaff than CT, respectively, whereas straw retention increased seed and straw yield by 33 and 19% compared to straw removal. Seed, straw and chaff yield of canola increased with N rate up to 40 kg N ha-1, and root mass (0-15 cm depth) with N rate to 80 kg N ha-1. Amount of N uptake and C removed in wheat and canola generally increased with N rate, but tillage and straw management had no consistent effect. After four crop seasons, total organic C (TOC) and N (TN), light fraction organic matter (LFOM), C (LFC), and N (LFN) were generally greater with S than NS treatments. Tillage did not affect TOC and TN in soil, but LFOM, LFC, and LFN were greater or tended to be greater under NT than CT. There was no effect of tillage, straw and N fertilization on NH4-N in soil, but CT and S tended to have higher NO3-N concentration in 0-15 cm soil than NT and NS, respectively. Concentration of NO3-N increased substantially with N rate > 80 kg ha-1. The NT + S treatment had the lowest proportion (34%) of wind-erodible (<0.83 mm diameter) aggregates and greatest proportion (37%) of larger (>12.7 mm) dry aggregates, compared to highest (50%) and lowest (18%) proportion of corresponding aggregates in CT + NS, indicating less potential for soil erosion when tillage was omitted and crop residues were retained . Amount of N lost as N2O was higher from N-fertilized than from zero-N plots, and it was substantially higher from N-applied CT plots than from N-applied NT plots. Retaining crop residues along with no-tillage improved soil properties and may also be better for the environment. The findings suggest that returning crop residue and no tillage would improve soil quality and productivity, and may also be better for the environment. N fertilization, although improving crop production, may increase the potential for NO3-N leaching and N2O-N emissions.

Back to 3.2B Dryland Conservation Technologies: Innovations for Enhancing Productivity and Sustainability - Poster
Back to WCSS

Back to The 18th World Congress of Soil Science (July 9-15, 2006)